Therefore, no one tries to create another kind of suitable understanding of the problem anymore, or clear action.
Perhaps it's just about enabling subsequent analysis and judgment.
Should it become unnecessary to have follow-ups on issues that cannot be analyzed or explored anymore?
This kind of cognition about a problem, or the actions taken to address it.
Essentially, this has also become something that makes it seem difficult to truly understand, or see the need to address.
Thus, perhaps faced with the events unfolding before him, he feels a kind of judgment about the situation that he himself can accept.
The subsequent thoughts gradually evolve in this predicament, becoming unnecessary for a more satisfying and suitable understanding of the problem.
So, facing the same problem observed in front of him again, what kind of seemingly satisfactory explanation and clear understanding can there be?
