Someone asked me: What exactly are you doing here? The content you wrote is completely baseless and lacks any argumentation. Moreover, there is currently no evidence to support it at all. In fact, what I want to say is just the truth. Even if what I say is true, there will still be some people who won't believe it and will demand evidence and arguments. But think about it, the lifespan of each generation is approximately only 100 years. Even if I tell you that a huge war occurred 70 years ago (World War II), that war was extremely cruel and chaotic, but today neither you nor I would have any feelings about it. So, what I am reiterating once again is this: Regarding what I have written, if I agree with it, I will agree; if I don't agree, I won't agree. Or many, many years later, it might be proven to be true. Or perhaps by that time, humanity has already perished. Even if it is true, it cannot be investigated. The important point is that in the current human origin theory, we always get stuck on the logic of whether the chicken or the egg came first. In the origin of living beings, we also adopt a set of "Darwinian evolution theory". These two logics, the former only defines two opposing choices, while the latter uses a relative logical thought to cover the origin of living beings. Whether it is one or the other, in today's world, they are not sufficient to prove anything; especially the current evolutionary theory, currently it can only prove that human genes and those of monkeys, and even mice are 99% the same. It only proves that human-like creatures have mastered tools, but one important thing is that mastering tools is not limited to human-like creatures in nature. Why can they continuously master it? Therefore, the way of mastering tools must be continuous, and it can be passed on and accepted by other species. Even if it is using a stone to hit, the first person used a stone to hit, it was passed on to the second person to use a stone to hit, and even to the third person would use a stone to hit. This requires a long time, and this time cannot be passed on in the harsh ancient environment - if human-like creatures could pass it on, that is, other species could also pass it on; however, human-like creatures are not just passing it on, they also adopted and used many more skills, such as making fire, such as group hunting, etc. All these skills, from today's perspective, are called "experience inheritance". However, without the physical memory of using these tools engraved in the genes, it would definitely be eliminated and disappeared; some people say that this is the inevitable result of an accidental occurrence, but without inevitability, then there would be no accident at all; therefore, the inevitable result must have come first, but in the development of many species, accidental selection of human-like species occurred, or rather, human-like species themselves were favored by the Creator and guided to happen inevitably - just this time is a little longer. Even today, with the continuous development of human technological civilization, yet without the choice of "nuclear weapons must appear and exist", even with many accidents, it would definitely not occur.
Returning to the topic, therefore, the emergence of human civilization is a certain result. No matter what is created and experimented out, this result is definitely there because it is certain to exist, so it emerges through various species' experiments and creations, and through accidental events.
What I am expressing is not evidence and the proof process, but rather saving a fragment glimpsed in the corner of the gene and trying to connect the various nodes in the gene memory.