The beginning of jointly facing the problem again brings about what kind of clear cognition, or rather, the ideal confrontation.
This will allow the subsequent exertion on the problem to yield a more specific and clear understanding, or rather, ideal action.
Does it mean that there is no longer a need for the uncertain understanding, or rather the concern of comprehension?
It is quite natural, as if it is the most ideal understanding of the situation leading to an excellent and satisfactory cognition, or rather, the analysis of handling.
It should lead to those subsequent cautious understandings or acceptance of the problem.
All of this will eliminate the need for those uncertain satisfactory cognitions or considerations about the problem.
How can one begin to concretely offer the most ideal explanation or clear cognition of the problem?
What follows seems to provide a more careful clear understanding or acceptance of the problem.
